Antonin Scalia and the Guise Constitutional Originalism

For the modern legal scholar you can go two routes of interpreting the constitution. One being the path of Antonin Scalia (the faint-hearted originalist), the other of William J. Brennan (the living constitutionalist). However there is a third approach to constitutional interpretation, which would be strict originalism.

Scalia agrees with much of the doctrine of originalism, but he describes it as the lesser evil and labels himself faint-hearted in regards to its adherence. However, if we are to stay true to the constitution’s absolute supremacy in law we must hold all of the constitution to the strictest of scrutiny. In Article 1: Section 1 of the U.S. constitution it’s clearly stated that “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” Take specific note of the word “herein”. The clause creates the notion that all powers (without exception or addition) granted to congress are listed within the document itself putting it’s parameters as the only ones by which they can exercise power. Let us not forget that this does not leave the document unmalleable to time, as the constitution has granted the legislature the ability to amend the constitution given they are successful in meeting the parameters for amendment as outlined in Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution. That said, Scalia’s “faint-hearted originalism” has little difference from Brennan’s living constitutionalism. One may argue Brennan takes no part of the constitution in its original context. However you’d be hard pressed to see him argue that an age requirement of 35 years old is required to become president as stated in Article II: Section 1 of the constitution as open to modern interpretation. In living constitutionalism there seems to be a spectral line of adherence to the original meaning of parts of the constitution.

Although Scalia claims to be an originalist, he is just farther down the spectral line of living constitutionalism in which he takes more in an original context while still subscribing to Brennan’s idea of leaving room for social progress and modern interpretations of the constitution. Therefore Scalia is not a faint hearted originalist, but rather a living constitutionalist.

Joseph T Enders II

Joe Enders is a true story of American success. Now only a college student he has overcome homelessness, abuse, and poverty. He is now an activist for Turning Point U.S.A. and a campus coordinator for his school. He graduated with an associates degree in arts with honors from the college of DuPage and is currently working towards his bachelors in Politics, Economics, and Philosophy at The King’s College. A school at which a majority of his tuition was paid for in scholarships and grants, and will soon be gratuated in may of 2018. Well versed in politics he successfully predicted the election of Donald Trump and even predicted him losing the popular vote. Joe believes his brand of right wing politics is the future of America and the conservative movement. Joe has been rapidly gaining popularity in the young Conservative movement. A frequent invitee of Conservative activist conferences, he has met and engaged with some of the most important figures in politics. He is even mentioned in the book of Turning Point USA founder, Charlie Kirk.

Please leave a reply to voice your thoughts.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s